MARCO ACCOLLA AND HIS DELUSIONAL R65 MILLION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE STATE

 

MARCO ACCOLLA ARROGANTLY SUES THE STATE…AND THEN REALISES WHAT A MISTAKE HE HAS MADE!

This is a brief summary of the matter. A very detailed report on the entire matter is being prepared and will be published on the internet soon. Information that will be published will be the actual affidavits by Marco Accolla, documents used by him in the fake liquidation (the false claims, the forged signatures), how he deviously and maliciously destroyed the lives and futures of so many innocent people because of his insane narcissistic personality.   

 

ARTICLE in The Sunday Tribune 25^th September 2016

Narandas and State now threatened with R65m law suit

·         Sunday Tribune

·         25 Sep 2016

 

Marco Accolla

Accolla and Narandas were romantically involved in 2007.

During their romance, they co-owned Noella and Rosario CC, which held the franchising rights for Ooh La La fashion boutiques.

Narandas previously claimed that for strategic business reasons, she had ceded ownership rights of the close corporation to Accolla.

But Accolla claimed he had been given full ownership of the business as a show of affection from Narandas.

Their relationship ended but their fight over ownership of the CC continued in court.

Accolla attempted to have the business voluntarily liquidated in 2014, which was blocked by Narandas.

However, the provisional liquidation of Noella and Rosario CC application was granted in November last year.

But two months before that order was granted, Maharaj and Accolla were arrested by the SAPS Commercial Crimes Unit for allegedly making the following misrepresentations:

• Listing Maharaj’s client, Nadeem Arshad, as the creditor of the CC.

• Accolla was owed R5m by the CC.

• Forging a nomination form.

As a result, Accolla and his attorney faced charges of fraud, forgery and uttering.

According to the charge sheet, Narandas suffered financial prejudice amounting to R5m.

The attorney and Accolla were granted bail of R5 000 each.

Charges against Accolla were withdrawn in July, and Maharaj earlier this week.

By the time of going to press the National Prosecuting Authority had not confirmed why they had withdrawn charges.

Accolla said: “We always knew we were innocent and the truth eventually prevailed.”

Accolla claimed that Narandas had abused the law for her own motives.

In response, Narandas said: “I do not harbour a personal vendetta against Accolla. Liquidation is a business matter, not a personal matter.

“I am not in the least perturbed by this as I have placed my trust and faith in the people who are dealing with my compliant,” said Narandas.

__________________________________________________________________________
Marco Accolla was under the mistaken belief that he had got away when the Serious Commercial Crime Unit withdrew the matter in 2015. The matter was never tried and he was not found to be “not guilty”. The matter was taken for further investigated by the Hawks in Pretoria and is now ready for charges to be preferred against Marco Accolla and all those who conspired with him. The Hawks have recently interviewed him and he knows it is only a matter of time now (days) before he will be arrested and formally charged.

In 2016, when he thought he “got away”, he brought a civil suit against the State and others suing for R25 million (not R65 million as he was boasting in the press).

The matter was set down for a week at the high court and when his legal representatives arrived in court they realized what and who they were coming up against. They asked for the matter to be stood down. Later that day, Marco Accolla withdrew against one of the Respondents and tendered her costs. Her costs are over R400 000. He has not paid these costs yet, he will have to soon. He is foolish as she is now going to be a witness for the State.

He asked for the matter to be adjourned and has not set the matter down yet. He knows why – he is going to lose and is going to also have to pay the State’s costs which are over R500 000.

READ THE DURBAN HIGH COURT FILES: CASE 10025/2016 

EXTRACT FROM MARCO ACCOLLA’S SUMMONS: 

 

Whilst all these points are frivolous and will never stand up in court, Point 20.4 is the most idiotic - he will have to show the court that he DECLARED R8.5m income to SARS for the period he is claiming for, and paid the appropriate tax.  

THAT’S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN GREED TAKES OVER.       ANOTHER LOSING CASE!!